Michael Vrbensky vs Mikalai Haliak Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: Vrbensky consistently wins 47.47% of points on second serves, outperforming Haliak, who wins 40.82%.
• Return Game: Vrbensky wins 28.74% points on first serve returns compared to Haliak's 25%, but Haliak slightly leads in second serve returns with 46.85% over Vrbensky's 44.03%.
• Under Pressure: Vrbensky excels with saving 53.41% of breakpoints, while Haliak saves 49.59%.
• Match Win Rate: Vrbensky holds a 53.45% win rate over the last year, slightly surpassing Haliak's 51.02%.
• Surface Strengths: Vrbensky’s strongest performance is on clay with a 62% win rate, contrasting with Haliak’s best on grass at 67%.
• Event Level: Vrbensky experiences tougher competition in higher-level tournaments than Haliak, reflected in their differing tournament strategies and win rates.
• Opponent Ranking: Vrbensky and Haliak have faced opponents with similar average ranks over the past year, with Vrbensky’s opponents ranked slightly higher.
• Deciding Sets: Vrbensky has a better record in deciding sets, winning 53% versus Haliak’s 46% over the past year.
• Breakpoint Conversion: Both players are nearly equal in this statistic, with Haliak at 32.84% slightly edging out Vrbensky's 32.35%.

Editorial Prediction (May 27, 2025, UTC):

As we anticipate the upcoming tennis match, the recent performance data provides a compelling narrative. Vrbensky demonstrates superior abilities in second serve points and a knack for saving breakpoints, which could significantly impact the momentum of the match.

While Haliak shows strength on grass, the current match setting might not favor him as much as Vrbensky’s consistency on clay surfaces, where he boasts a strong win percentage. The comparably weaker saving and conversion stats might be hurdles for Haliak.

Vrbensky’s experience in higher-level tournaments and his advantageous track record in deciding sets provide him with an edge. Taking these factors into consideration, Vrbensky is more likely to emerge victorious in this encounter.